Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Do you like the Tunze Multicontroller or the GHL Tunze control better?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    18.04.2010
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    19

    Default Do you like the Tunze Multicontroller or the GHL Tunze control better?

    Curious about answers.
    I prefer Tunze multicontroller because it provides better waves.
    For some reason I cannot get GHL settings to match up.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    14.10.2009
    Posts
    86

    Default

    I'm looking at this too, I have my 6095's connected to the GHL but it doesn't seem to be able to match the Tunze 7076's ability like the storm mode. I'd like to see two things from GHL, the first would be GHL Tunze cable's that allow the Tunze pump to run on battery backup if the GHL is off (I know there is a DIY to do this but I don't see why GHL can't make this) and secondly some development in the Wave modes to match the Tunze 7096. Regards, Andy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    30.04.2013
    Location
    İstanbul
    Posts
    32

    Default

    I heartily agree with you Andy. I have the cables but still run them via multicontroller because i don't have a UPS to run profilux when power goes out. My battery can run 4 tunzes i own for 20 hours+.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14.10.2009
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Hi Matthias, seriously, is this something you could manufacture - a new Tunze cable that allows battery backup to work or an addon to existing cables maybe? I'd really like to see the Tunze controller Storm mode added too. Regards, Andy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •