Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: KH Director reading too high - tried a lot of the known fixes

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    17.03.2021
    Posts
    9

    Default KH Director reading too high - tried a lot of the known fixes

    Hi
    I've recently setup a KH Director and it is still reporting high dKH. Reports around 2-3 dKH higher than actual value. Here is what I have tried, some of it several times

    1. Measured and remeasured all the lines
    2. Calculated volume by disconnecting and dispensing into a 50ml graduated cylinder - twice - this was within 2ml of measured/ calculated volume by length
    3. Re-calibrated pH probe 3 times - all readings after calibration have been within .2 of 4 and 7
    4. Re-calibrated dosing heads twice - each calibration within 0.5ml of each other
    5. Checked for air bubbles, multiple flushing and venting reagent
    6. I ordered some GHL KH reference fluid and its ran three times 10.2, 10.1 and 10
    7. Hanna checker gives me a dKH of 8 (tank water)
    8. KHD gives me a consistent 10.3
    9. Saltwater is Tropic Marin Pro made up to std strength i.e. 1kg/30litres which should be about 7-8 dKH

    I really don't know what else to check, the only thing which is odd is the waste is being reported much higher than is being produced - waste on dosing pump 3 is showing as 1439ml in the container at most its 950ml - this has been consistently high

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    07.05.2020
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Consistency is the key ... my KHD records between 9.5 and 10 testing twice a day. Recent Triton N-Doc test shows 9.8.

    I could never get Hanna tester to agree so stopped using it.

    If the KHD is accurate versus the ref fluid then I would be happy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    17.03.2021
    Posts
    9

    Default

    That's the problem, it isnt accurate versus a brand new GHL KH reference fluid, I've now done 4 tests with the reference fluid 10.2, 10.1, 10 and 10.5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    07.05.2020
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Row1974 View Post
    That's the problem, it isnt accurate versus a brand new GHL KH reference fluid, I've now done 4 tests with the reference fluid 10.2, 10.1, 10 and 10.5
    That's 10, 10, 10 and 10

  5. #5
    Join Date
    17.03.2021
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_The_Reefer View Post
    That's 10, 10, 10 and 10
    Yes but it should be 7.5, 7.5, 7.5 and 7.5 (+/- 0.2) - its consistent but it isnt within the tolerance of the reference solution so why would it be consistently high
    Last edited by Row1974; 17.03.2021 at 14:21.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    07.05.2020
    Posts
    28

    Default

    What sample volume are you using?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    08.09.2020
    Posts
    22

    Default

    My KHD is 0.7 out.

    Here are some Tips to setup

    • Put the filter at the end of the sample line in my sump.

    • Sealed the line connection on the water filter with a small zip tie.
    • I ended up calibrating the pump speeds 4X and took the average and used that for the measurement.
    • I moved the water sample intake to a different part of the sump and shortened the line.
    • Instead of measuring the sample water tube with a ruler, I filled it with water and then measured the exact ml of water that came out. Definitely a different measurement than measuring the length of line with a ruler.
    • Switched to a sample size of 100mL instead of 80mL.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    17.03.2021
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I used the digital scales accurate to 0.1ml - reagent was off by 2.1ml - around 30%, sample was off by 1ml - around 2% - with the weighed calibration, results for reference fluid were 7.4, 7.5 and 7.2 so its clear the documented process has limitations and perhaps should be reviewed

  9. #9
    Join Date
    07.05.2020
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Vinny posted this
    Quote Originally Posted by Vinny View Post
    Hello Oscar,

    The correct tolerance when using the KHD and Reference solution is +/- 0.4° dkH (0.2 from KHD and 0.2 from Reference solution).
    Given your results, you are within the tolerance range.

    If you would like to get the KHD result a bit closer to the 7.5 mark, check again your tube lengths and calibrate your pump heads. When calibrating pump heads, you can use a digital scale to get the most precise measurement; 1g = 1mL

    You can also verify your water sample tube volume by temporarily disconnecting the tube going into the KHD and manually filling both ends of the tube. Empty this tube into a digital scale or measuring cup and type-in the amount into the tube volume field in the KHD settings page.
    In addition to putting the filter at the end of the sample tube I found tiewrapping the filter in a 25mm pvc tee helped the consistency (and kept the filter where I wanted it)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    17.03.2021
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_The_Reefer View Post
    Vinny posted this

    In addition to putting the filter at the end of the sample tube I found tiewrapping the filter in a 25mm pvc tee helped the consistency (and kept the filter where I wanted it)
    Thanks, I'm happy with it now I've determined the calibration volumes by weight and results are as expected - less happy that I had to purchase microscales and I've used almost an entire bottle of reference fluid trying to work out what was wrong - in my opinion the documentation should reflect the importance of the calibration volume particularly the reagent and that the volume should be determined by weight

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •